Wednesday, May 17, 2006

Bianchi and Thomas Debate on Arena on Orlando Radio Station.

On Tuesday afternoon on 740 the Team's "Coach and Company", Mike Bianchi and Mike Thomas had a moderated debate about the current arena situation. Mike Thomas admitted that the ½% funds from the increase in the tourist tax should go to Orlando facilities, however the city needs to back it up with other taxes as an emergency fun, should the tourism tank. Thomas also made a feeble attempt to try and justify that priority of the tax should be on the proposed 2500 seat PAC, because it would lead to more growth downtown than a 17,500 seat arena. While higher classes of people attend more of the events at the PAC, the Magic games have their share of that population plus others, leading to an arena that would promote a diverse population downtown.

The result of the debate rang clear, Orange County has the funding available, and the arena, performing arts center, and Citrus Bowl deserve part of that money. Orlando, in its pursuit to be a premier American city, wants to distance its tourism image. From high rise condos to revamped local entertainment districts, the city is slowly molding image it hopes to someday be, the arena would only further this.

Bianchi's argument featured the fact that Tampa has recently obtained the rights to the ACC, SEC basketball tournaments and the Women's Basketball Final Four. Events that might not have been shoo-ins in the Orlando area, but would easily be considered with a new arena. The conversation then led into a debate about concerts that have passed up the population base of 2 million in Metro Orlando. Thomas argued that these concerts did not come because the arena was filled by dates scheduled for the Magic and Predators, however the St. Pete Times Forum has two similar residents in the Lightning and Storm, using the arena almost as much as the TD Waterhouse is used. This argument would be good, had it been last year, when the NHL was locked out.

To sum it up outside of the Citrus Bowl you could not form a solid argument against a new arena or PAC when tourist funding is available. Both Bianchi and Thomas did a good job giving their views to a hcontroversialversal issue. Every great American city has great venues for public use. Will Orlando join the ranks or will it stay as it is, a good city supported by tourism?


The Debate can be found here:
http://www.orlandosentinel.com/orl-740podcastdebate-051606,0,4612629.mp3file?coll=orl-home-promo

Monday, May 08, 2006

Comparing Arenas

Orlando is considered to be a "small market" franchise in the NBA, therefore comparing the arena and the city to other "small market" cities who have recently upgraded their facilities gives you an idea of why many are saying that the TD Waterhouse Centre is out of date. These cities have all taken the initiative to make sure they are able to compete for exposure and the best concerts/shows/sporting events, will Orlando/Orange County do the same?

All of these venues are deemed state of the art and have enough suites (in GOOD locations) to assure that the venue can survive for a very long time. If you compare the previous venues to the TD Waterhouse, you can see that these clubs also had similar set ups, costs, and dates of construction.

FedEx Forum - Memphis, TN

Specs:
Date: 2004
Ownership: City of Memphis and Shelby County
Cost of Construction: $250 Million
Arena Financing: Public

Seating:
Basketball: 18,165
Hockey: 12,633
Luxury Suites: 75 Suites
Club Seats: 2,500

Previous Venue

The Pyramid
Date: 1992
Basketball: 20,000
Hockey: n/a
Concerts: 21,000
Luxury Suites: 26 Suites
Club Seats: None


AT&T Center - San Antonio, TX

Specs:
Date: 2002
Ownership: VIA Transit Authority, City of San Antonio
Cost of Construction: $186 million
Arena Financing: City sales tax

Seating:
Basketball: 18,500
Rodeo: 17,000
Hockey: 13,000
Luxury Suites: 50 Suites

Previous Venue:

Alamodome:
Date: 1992
Basketball: 20,662
Luxury Suites: 38 Suites
Club Seats: 6,000

Charlotte Arena - Charlotte, NC

Specs:
Date: 2006
Ownership: City of Charlotte
Cost of Construction: $265 million
Arena Financing: 100% publicly funded

Seating:
Basketball: 18,500
Hockey: 14,100
Luxury Suites: 51 Suites
Club Seats: 2,300

Previous Venue:

Charlotte Coliseum
Date: 1988
Ownership: City of Charlotte
Cost of Construction: $52 Million
Arena Financing: 100% publicly funded
Basketball: 24,042
Hockey: 21,684
Concerts: 23,780
Boxing: 23,041
Luxury Suites: 12 Suites
Club Seats: None

TD Waterhouse Centre

Date: January 29, 1989
Ownership: City of Orlando
Cost of Construction: $98 million

Seating:

Basketball: 17,248
Hockey: 15,948
Luxury Suites: 26 Suites
Club Seats:
None